TECHNET Archives

February 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:12:41 -0600
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1056 bytes) , TEXT.htm (2298 bytes)
Yes it is a reject, a fracture is a fracture.  How could you assure that the fracture wouldn't continue to get worse over time?  Another thought, how can you be assured that what you see is actually the full extent of the issue?

Kathy

>>> [log in to unmask] 02/27/01 09:56AM >>>

Hi Technetters,
 
It is stated in IPC-A-610C that a fractured joint is considered defect in all classes.  Can anyone
confirm that it would be the same if the fracture is on the component side?  And why should
it be considered as defect if the joint on the secondary side is good.  Would the fracture
extend from the primary side to the secondary side?
 
Thanks in advance...
 
JF


WABTEC CORPORATION CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE
The content contained in this e-mail transmission is legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named herein. If the reader of this transmission is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this transmission is strictly prohibited.



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type> <META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY style="FONT: 8pt Arial; MARGIN-LEFT: 2px; MARGIN-TOP: 2px"> <DIV><FONT size=1>Yes it is a reject, a fracture is a fracture.&nbsp; How could you assure that the fracture wouldn't continue to get worse over time?&nbsp; Another thought, how can you be assured that what you see is actually the full extent of the issue?</FONT></DIV> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV> <DIV><FONT size=1>Kathy</FONT><BR><BR>&gt;&gt;&gt; [log in to unmask] 02/27/01 09:56AM &gt;&gt;&gt;<BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=323035115-27022001>Hi Technetters,</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=323035115-27022001></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=323035115-27022001>It is stated in IPC-A-610C that a fractured joint is considered defect in all classes.&nbsp; Can anyone</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=323035115-27022001>confirm that it would be the same if the fracture is on the component side?&nbsp; And why should</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=323035115-27022001>it be considered as defect if the joint on the secondary side is good.&nbsp; Would the fracture</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=323035115-27022001>extend from the primary side to the secondary side?</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=323035115-27022001></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=323035115-27022001>Thanks in advance...</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=323035115-27022001></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=323035115-27022001>JF</SPAN></FONT></DIV><CODE><FONT size=3><BR><BR>WABTEC CORPORATION CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE<BR>The content contained in this e-mail transmission is legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named herein. If the reader of this transmission is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this transmission is strictly prohibited.<BR></FONT></CODE></BODY></HTML>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2