Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | TechNet E-Mail Forum. |
Date: | Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:36:51 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Werner,
I assume that grain structure/intermetallic/oxidation growth is not a linear
process with respect to conditioning time (correct me if I am wrong). Compared
to 100 hrs exposure at 125C, would longer conditioning, say 500 hrs, yield
significant changes in the properties of the solder material and its fatigue
life or does the bulk of this process occur during the initial 100 hrs?
Thomas Buschor
Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Harris Corp., Melbourne, Florida
Tel: 321.729.3288
Fax: 321.729.7348
Email: [log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 9:49 PM
To: [log in to unmask]; Buschor, Thomas
Subject: Re: [TN] Test Vehicle Conditioning
Hi Tom,
100hrs @ 125C and 300hrs @ 100C are to represent about 1 year at 25C.
Werner Engelmaier
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|