TECHNET Archives

February 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
Mark Hargreaves <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 21:17:55 -0800
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, Murray Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Murray Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<E3F39BDE675ED31192CE00508B2C8CAB123F7E@POSTMASTER2>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Dear Mr. Hargreaves,

There are many companies offering alternatives to "black oxide".  Most of
these alternatives work on the mechanism of creating an enhanced surface
topography by way of micro-etching the copper surface, and co-depositing a
thin organic coating to provide additional chemical bonding.  The
alternatives can be processed by either vertical dip tanks or conveyorized
horizontal equipment.  Bond strength, as measured by peel strength tests,
are typically the same or better than traditional oxide.  Process times are
reduced due to fewer steps required.  Please note that these types of
alternatives do generate a copper bearing waste stream.  Different
formulations will require different etch depths and different loading
capabilities of copper in solution.  Depending on the volume of cores
processed, and the formulation capabilities of the alternative, this might
become an issue with your waste treatment system.

Murray Anderson
Insulectro

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Mark Hargreaves
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 12:30 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Black oxide alternatives- multilayer bonding

Hi All,
     We plan to begin fabricating multilayer boards on Rogers materials this
year (probably 4320 & 4003).
We currently use "double treat" FR4 cores and no longer have a black oxide
line.  I assume the double treat or oxide is there to promote bonding.  Are
there any suitable alternatives? Or should I start making space to set up
the oxide line again?

Thanks,
Mark Hargreaves

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET
Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2