TECHNET Archives

January 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robert Lazzara <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Sun, 7 Jan 2001 10:22:58 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
In a message dated 1/5/01 5:11:51 PM Eastern Standard Time, [log in to unmask]
writes:

<< Let us look at the bond theory, and ask what is being done to the Copper
 before the nomenclature ink is applied, and ask, can we do something there to
 improve that bond. >>

I'm confused (not an uncommon circumstance): Why are we putting legend ink on
copper? Typically the only areas relieved by solder mask are solderable
lands, and most PWB designers & fabricators go out of their way to ensure
legend ink IS NOT on these areas.

My original understanding was that there was legend ink peeling from solder
mask (and by-the-way, has the solder mask cure been validated?).

Bob Lazzara
Circuit Connect, Inc.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2