TECHNET Archives

January 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robert Lazzara <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 11:13:55 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
In a message dated 1/24/01 11:05:51 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

<< has an OSP over the silver why bother with the silver?  Wouldn't less
interfaces
 between the component
 and trace be better? >>

For that matter, why not use immersion tin? Why bother introducing a third
metal into your solder joint?

Otherwise, the immersion silver -- as with most immersion processes -- is
reported to be more robust in multiple solder pass applications, has improved
shelf life and is somewhat less sensitive to marginal handling practices than
OSP.

Cheers!

Bob Lazzara
Tech Support
Circuit Connect, Inc.
(800) 560-9457

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2