TECHNET Archives

December 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 1 Dec 2000 15:41:04 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (56 lines)
Michael

Am sorry, you are wrong. Placing two tracks in parallel will halve the
inductance and the resistance. Whether it is necessary or not depends on
the reactance of the cap and track inductances at the frequencies
concerned, assuming that it's going down to an ultra-low impedance
ground plane. If the app is low-impedance, high current, high-frequency
or ultra-rapid, then my guess is that your engineer may have a sound
case. At the worst, it won't do any harm. As for the real-estate, it's
not much, is it?

Brian

"Kuczynski, Michael @ SPACENAV" wrote:
>
> I have an engineer who wants to place 2 vias per side on a 0508 capacitor
> for decoupling. (I tried to draw figure below)
> He says it will help in filtering and if it isn't done, then don't bother
> putting any caps on (idle threat)
> The fanout trace is .010 / via is an .013 / SMT pad is .035 x .080 / spacing
> between vias is .0625 (center2center)
> I think it's horse-hockey and will introdure more inductance, beside taking
> up routing channels
> I'm looking for any support pro or con on this configuration.
>
>       -------     -------
> o----|      |     |      |----o
>       |      |     |      |
> o----|      |     |      |----o
>       ------      -------
>
> Michael Kuczynski    Librarian/Sr. Designer
> L3 Communications    1-201-393-2122 (Ph)
> Space & Navigation   1-201-393-6681 (Fax)
> 699 Rt. 46 E         Mail Stop PL1/J8
> Teterboro,NJ 07680
> [log in to unmask]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2