TECHNET Archives

December 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"<Rudy Sedlak>" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 8 Dec 2000 10:14:09 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
With Electroless NI underneath, presumably.

We assume that the boards were processed in a normal manner, and went
directly from Electroless Ni to Gold, with no time elapsing between to allow
passivation of the EN?  (This might explain differences on the same panel)

And we assume the Gold bath was running properly, appropriate pH, metal
level, etc?

The problem probably originated in the EN, however, if preclean before EN was
questionable, this could have caused the problem.  Even developing (of the
soldermask) can create problems, if it is not done properly..and the problems
in developing will not show until EN and Gold are applied.


Rudy Sedlak
RD Chemical Company

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2