TECHNET Archives

December 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"<Rudy Sedlak>" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 7 Dec 2000 20:30:37 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
First guess is to clean using the same technology that you used for previous
flux.

Anything left is likely supposed to be there (i.e. No-Clean residues).

Chloride is funny.  There is two kinds.  The soluble stuff that comes off in
any good aqueous cleaning.  Then there is Lead Chloride, which is marginally
soluble, and slowly at that.  That is the enemy, and there are no easy
chemical tests, although the conductivity tests are not bad.  However, I am
not sure if that sort of test can be done on populated boards.

Rudy Sedlak
RD Chemical Company

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2