TECHNET Archives

December 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Barmuta, Mike" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 6 Dec 2000 08:04:58 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
Jol:  Stainless steel is not a very good conductor; graphite is worse. The
material of choice is typically monel which also will not react with
fluoboric bath chemistry.


Michael Barmuta

Staff Engineer

Fluke Corp.

Everett WA

425-356-6076

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprowles, Jol [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 11:00 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Solder Baskets



For plating tin/lead from fluoroborate baths, what is the current wisdom of
using stainless steel baskets for anode balls? Relative strong points of
graphite vs. stainless steel?

Thank you,


Jol Sprowles, Ph.D.
Senior Process Engineer
Tyco / Electronics / Printed Circuit Group - Stafford Division
Phone: (860)684-5881 ext. 263

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2