TECHNET Archives

November 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 2 Nov 2000 11:35:03 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Hi Ron,
Even under the best of circumstances, Alloy 42 wets much less readily than Cu
(the dissolution rate of Ni into Sn is about 100x less than that of Cu), and
there is Alloy 42 used in Asia that cames (perhaps) from a south Korean mill
that is not solderable no matter what you do. HP ran into this and published
a paper on it.
Why on Earth would anybody use Alloy 42 in an QFP? That is about as bad as it
can get (much less compliancy than Cu leads).

Werner Engelmaier
Engelmaier Associates, L.C.
Electronic Packaging, Interconnection and Reliability Consulting
7 Jasmine Run
Ormond Beach, FL  32174  USA
Phone: 904-437-8747, Fax: 904-437-8737
E-mail: [log in to unmask], Website: www.engelmaier.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2