TECHNET Archives

November 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 16 Nov 2000 20:12:14 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Mike,

Based on what we all know as certain "truths" concerning Alloy 42 solder
wettability, I'm looking for an alternative to that metal - first. Knowing
what we all know concerning the TCE matching characteristics between this
alloy and ceramic, are there alternatives, other than Kovar and/or Invar,
exhibiting better solderability characteristics as well. I cannot think of
any.

My application requires receiving typical, pre-tinned (soldered) TCE
matching "lids" for ceramic mating to ensure hermetic sealing during and
after a reflow process. This is assuming a similar metallization is made to
the ceramic that too is solderable.

Simply, I don't know the latest and greatest ceramic/metal seal. Moreover,
is there one?

Earl

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2