TECHNET Archives

October 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 21:05:57 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
Hi,
IPC-SM-785 is not just for SMT; solder behavior is independent of 
application. 
The "15 minutes (min.)" dwell times comes from the limitations of commercial 
thermo-cyclic chambers and has nothing to do with the solder behavior. With 
modified chambers one can run down to about 3.5 minutes; then problems with 
differential heating rates due to different thermal masses become too large 
and one no longer has a sufficiently well-defined dwell time. As Günter 
pointed out the time required to (lets say 98% stress reduction 
(creep)=conversion of elastically stored strains to plastic strains) will 
vary significantly with the temperature. I would however, recommend that you 
do not use 40C/min or larger, because at those large rates of temperature 
change thermal shock effects become significant and acclerated test results 
become dominated by totally different loading conditions than your product 
sees.
In accelerated testing, one takes advantage of empirical modeling which 
accounts for incomplete creep due to short dwell times (see equations in 
IPC-SM-785).
You do not say what "space-borne" application you are talking about; there is 
a huge difference between a space probe, e.g. Magellan, and a LEO satelite. 
Also, when thermal cycling between extremes of -55C and +125C, the solder is 
damaged by more than one damage mechanism, and your accelerated testing 
results will be confunded by these different mechanisms. If your CTEs between 
parts & PWB will be matched to <5ppm/C difference, you may noy have much to 
worry about unless the components are large. 
I would recommend you read IPC-SM-785 and IPC-D-279, Appendix A, to get an 
understanding of the behavior of solder. A workshop on solder joint 
reliability (see my website) would also help a lot.

Werner Engelmaier
Engelmaier Associates, L.C.
Electronic Packaging, Interconnection and Reliability Consulting
7 Jasmine Run
Ormond Beach, FL  32174  USA
Phone: 904-437-8747, Fax: 904-437-8737
E-mail: [log in to unmask], Website: www.engelmaier.com 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2