TECHNET Archives

October 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Park Matthew <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:00:06 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
We want to place traces under 1206, 805 and low-profile SOT23 components.
We are currently doing that for some designs and desginers are pushing for
it even further.  I am against placing traces under these components because
of greater potential for causing tomstoning, shorting possibilities, and not
being a robust design.  What are your thoughts for this?  Is there any data
or studies done to show it is ok or not ok to run traces under chip
components.

We ran a typical SMT process with LPI solder mask, water-soluble and
no-clean (very soon) and reflowed using convection ovens.

thanks
Matthew S. Park
Sr. Process Engineer
Phoenix International Inc.  Fargo, ND.
Tel: 701-282-9364, ext 434
Fax: 701-282-9365

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2