TECHNET Archives

October 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tenison Stone <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 07:35:07 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Let me revise this request.

I would like to direct the question below to companies that build both
class 1 and class 2 assemblies.

What is the difference in your process for class 1 and class 3, and what is
the difference in quoting for class 1 and class 3?

What is the typical cost difference if I build class 1 product and want to
change to class 3?

For instance, my class 1 board cost $10.00 to build, what would be the cost
to build this board to class 3?

A little bit of background, we are building assemblies for a sister plant.
We build smt parts only (no TH) and we do not test the boards.  I cannot
imagine a contract house that would accept these constraints, let alone
agree to class 3 requirements.  What are your feelings?  We are trying to
improve our processes working within the constraints given.



Thank you for your help.

Tenison Stone
Telex Communications

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF TECHNET
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2