TECHNET Archives

October 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Subject:
From:
Daniel Woon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 21:29:17 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, Daniel Woon <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Hi TechNetters,

Does anyone has experience of integrating a stand-alone flux station on a
SMD placement machine?  If yes, appreciate if you can recommend any third
party manufacturer of flux stations available in the market?

We are currently engaging in flip chip placement and flux dipping is a must
for such process.  We being told that for smaller bump size like in the
range of 4 mils diameter, "Linear" dip fluxing works better than the
"Rotary" motion method.

We would like to integrate an off-line flux station on our SMD placement
machine.  Again, if anyone has relevant information in this regard, can you
please share with me?

Many thanks in advance,

Daniel Woon
Assistant Manager, PCBA Department
Email: [log in to unmask]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF TECHNET
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2