TECHNET Archives

September 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 8 Sep 2000 08:32:13 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Dear Technetters!
We test SMT components for solderability after more than 6 months of
storage.
On most of them we perform the dip test and also the solder paste
reflow  test.(of course not on the same ones).
Sometimes we do not get the same results:
The dip test shows more defects than the reflow test. I know that the
test conditions, especially the flux, are not the same, and the final
judgement is done according to the reflow test, although theoretically,
the dip test seems to me more accurate .

What is the right decision in your opinion?

Regards,
Gaby

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2