Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | TechNet E-Mail Forum. |
Date: | Fri, 1 Sep 2000 07:26:34 -0500 |
Content-Type: | multipart/mixed |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Rick
We have eliminated the dams on 25 mil and below. Fewer headaches. We are not having any
bridging problems. I feel that the stencil gaskets to the pad better without the solder
dams.
One thought from the bleachers,
Gary Camac
Rick Thompson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a customer who has a board with 20 mil pitch QFP's on it. The
> actual pad size is 11.8 mils wide and there is a 2 mil gap in the soldermask
> around the pads leaving 4.2 mils of solder mask between the pads. The board
> house that is building these says they can't maintain the soldermask between
> the pads and is asking for a window around all leads in the group or a
> tightening of the soldermask openings around the pads. Before I go to our
> customer with this, I'd like to get some feedback on whether or not this is
> unreasonable? Are these dimensions acheivable or should I ask our customer
> for a deviation?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Rick Thompson
> Ventura Electronics Assembly
> 2665A Park Center Dr.
> Simi Valley, CA 93065
>
> +1 (805) 584-9858 voice
> +1 (805) 584-1529 fax
> [log in to unmask]
>
> ##############################################################
> TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
> ##############################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the body:
> To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
> To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
> ##############################################################
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
> information.
> If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.5315
> ##############################################################
|
|
|