TECHNET Archives

September 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 29 Sep 2000 10:13:49 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
I mentioned that in my original reply to Rich, if it makes sense then you can
simply trim to length and drop the parts in and not worry about it.  In our
case there are ~140 DIP ICs that get placed into the board x 8 seconds a part
for our CS400s = almost 19 min vs 2.5 min for DIP insertion.  I don't think
we're doing 16.5 min of trimming.  Also our CS400s are the bottleneck and
hand stuffing that many parts probably wouldn't be a good idea.  But we may
be able to back off the DIP clinch even farther to a 20 - 30 degree bend ....
and not have parts fall/bounce out during processing.

MIKE

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2