TECHNET Archives

September 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 1 Sep 2000 14:33:32 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Of course the holes could not be tested in such a manner, the article
dealt with the AOI supplementing ET, not as an absolute replacement, it
just got me thinking I see jobs on occasion, most double-sided, where I
think "why are we testing these boards..." These are typically wide
trace through hole product drilled at .040 - .050 or larger...and
they're usually are a ton and a half of them. Just wondering if I'd save
time and money performing an optical inspection on the AOI, of course
the customer would save in fixture and testing cost...just a thought is
all.

Franklin

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2