TECHNET Archives

September 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 16:36:32 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Got answers from Gerry, Stephan, Robert, Ryan and possibly some other, again thanks a lot. But Steph, you made me confused, you said higher P will eliminate aggressive mask attach from IG and reduce risk for building up fragile P-enrichet layers between Ni/Sn intermetal and Ni.  This is opposite to what some other of you told me, namely that you should avoid high P% baths.  So, what do we prefer: little Phosphorous or much Phosphorous. Please, don't say 'moderate'.
Or is it more a question of what IG we use (Biunno's article about 'hyperactive IG corrosion on Nickel)?

I can tell you the more simple solution if there is a problem: a company I know just skipped phosphorous baths, and there were no more BGA soldering problems.  What do you think?

Ingemar
Ericsson Microwave Systems

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2