Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | TechNet E-Mail Forum. |
Date: | Tue, 12 Sep 2000 16:36:32 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Got answers from Gerry, Stephan, Robert, Ryan and possibly some other, again thanks a lot. But Steph, you made me confused, you said higher P will eliminate aggressive mask attach from IG and reduce risk for building up fragile P-enrichet layers between Ni/Sn intermetal and Ni. This is opposite to what some other of you told me, namely that you should avoid high P% baths. So, what do we prefer: little Phosphorous or much Phosphorous. Please, don't say 'moderate'.
Or is it more a question of what IG we use (Biunno's article about 'hyperactive IG corrosion on Nickel)?
I can tell you the more simple solution if there is a problem: a company I know just skipped phosphorous baths, and there were no more BGA soldering problems. What do you think?
Ingemar
Ericsson Microwave Systems
##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################
|
|
|