IPC-600-6012 Archives

September 2000

IPC-600-6012@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: FW: Exposed copper
From:
"David C. Gendreau" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 5 Sep 2000 12:31:28 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
The point NOW is not what the past intent is/was nor should the question be,
 does it met ome number in a spec but rather "is it a reliability issue, - it
isn't"!
Exposed copper on the side of traces has always been acceptable including the
old "mil spec".  New "High-technology" boards today are being used & shipped
with NO reliability issue.

Dave Gendreau
President & CEO
DMG Engineering
[log in to unmask]
www.DMGengineering.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2