Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 29 Sep 2000 10:46:20 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
<<Follow-up Survey1.rtf>>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Perry [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 10:19 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [IPC-600-6012] Strawman Follow-up survey for IPC-A-600 /
> IPC-6012 Merge Issue
>
> Colleagues,
>
> During IPCWorks 2000 I had a chance to present attendees with copies of a
> strawman for a proposed follow-up survey on the IPC-600/6012 Merge topic.
> The initial survey that went out to the industry earlier this year was not
> structured in such a way that we could guarantee that the recipients of
> the survey were actual users of the two documents. That being said, it
> was suggested that a more detailed follow-up survey be distributed to
> obtain a more accurate response.
>
> Attached is a strawman effort for this follow-up. To garnish the response
> rate that I'll be looking for, history has shown we get best results when
> the survey doesn't extend into multiple pages. Short ones get filled out
> and sent back relatively quickly.
>
> I'd like this groups comments or suggestions on the questions within this
> strawman survey. I'd like to whittle it down from the 22 questions to
> perhaps a dozen at most - whatever I can get on one page. Any
> recommendations or suggestions you'd have are greatly appreciated.
>
> Let's go for having any recommendations submitted by 10/16/00.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
> John Perry
> Technical Project Manager
> IPC
> 2215 Sanders Road
> Northbrook, Il 60062
> 1-847-790-5318 (P)
> 1-847-509-9798 (F)
> [log in to unmask]
> << File: Follow-up Survey1.rtf >>
|
|
|