TECHNET Archives

August 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Olson, Jack" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 13:01:36 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
For those of you who use IPC-D-356x format netlist in your board testers, I have two types of questions I am having trouble understanding:

Does anyone know if there is a difference in the quality of the data between IPC-D-356 and IPC-D-356A versions? Does the newer versions give any MORE data? IS a netlist a netlist or is there more to the story?

And when you load the IPC netlist into the tester you are testing the gerber-data-generated-board against the PCB-database-generated-netlist data. Since this happens at the back end, are you also comparing the IPC netlist to a gerber extracted netlist at the front end CAM? Are there potential problems with this comparison?

Jack (who still seems like the new guy)

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2