TECHNET Archives

August 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Sauer, Steven T." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 29 Aug 2000 13:24:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Good afternoon all,

I'm in the middle of an internal debate regarding the use of the 2 IPC
fabrication documents as replacements for the old MIL-P-55110 and
MIL-P-50884.  The dilemma stems from the title of 50884 containing
"Rigid-Flex" while the title of IPC-6013 only contains "Flex".  The
questions are:  Is 6012 a replacement specification for 55110?  Is 6013 a
replacement specification for 50884?  I have a rigid-flex PCB, does one
specify 6012 for the rigid portion of the PCB and 6013 for the flex portion?
Thanks in advance for your inputs.

Steve Sauer
Manufacuturing Engineer
Xetron Corporation

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2