Doug

I second every word you say. Some of them make large contributions to a reduction of
reliability.

I've also tested some water-soluble ones, with results from total removal to poor
removal and no detriment to reliability to total disaster. However, the removal process
takes much longer than flux removal, in most cases, and is usually insufficient in
conveyorised machines running under usual conditions.

Brian

Douglas Pauls wrote:

> In a message dated 08/21/2000 1:41:53 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> > Any manufacturers in here have experience with peelable mask?
>
> Sure.  Both good and bad............
>
> >  Only the good points are ever discussed in the sales brochures.
>
> I'm shocked.
>
> >  I'm looking for the evil
> >  side. It seems to go against everything I've ever tried to accomplish with
> a
> >  solder mask and it makes me a little nuts to think a customer wants to undo
> >  what we try so hard to do! I'm afraid next they'll want removable
> >  traces.....Any thoughts or comments appreciated.
>
> We have done a number of failure analysis in which the latex peelable mask
> was the source of detrimental halide residues.  A couple have been published
> in Circuits Assembly and one upcoming one in PC Fab.  I think they are on our
> web site (Library section of www.residues.com).
>
> We found that the latex masks leave high levels of chloride and sulfate on
> the surface of the boards.  The organic residues can inhibit soldering and
> the halide residues cause leakage and corrosion.  Not a good idea to use
> these in a no-clean application.  The mask itself can (depending on the mask)
> absorb the flux it comes into contact with.  The vendors say this is not a
> problem because you throw away the mask later.  Unfortunately, the residues
> remain on the board surface.  In other cases, we have found that the reaction
> mechanism leaves by-products on surrounding surfaces.  As one other
> contributor pointed out, the masks may be ammonia based.  If you can smell
> the reaction byproducts, then it is depositing on other surfaces as well.
>
> I have played around with SIR testing on the latex masks and don't get very
> good response from either the material or the residues left by the material.
>
> Doug Pauls
> CSL
>
> ##############################################################
> TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
> ##############################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
> ##############################################################
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
> information.
> If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.5315
> ##############################################################

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################