TECHNET Archives

July 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
PLCC Coplanarity... (or lack of)
From:
Mike Lang <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 26 Jul 2000 14:42:39 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary="=_4E160551.5B3A53ED"
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, Mike Lang <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (243 bytes) , TEXT.htm (675 bytes) 
I got very little response to my coplanarity post, which leads me to believe that either no one else is having the problem, or no one else is using PLCC's, or...

Is anyone out there using PLCC's without the coplanarity problems?




Thanks,

Lang
x5046

ATOM RSS1 RSS2