TECHNET Archives

June 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jon Moore <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:58:35 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
In a message dated 6/27/00 5:41:04 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

<<
 Please forgive this basic question, but what would be the smallest
 lead-to-hole ratio in which you would attempt to auto-insert an axial part
 (with a Universal VCD 6287)?

 I'm fairly new in this arena, my focus has always been with SMT. But anyways,
 I've always heard that the holes should be .015"-.020" larger that the lead
 diameter. On Universal's web page they have a *.PDF through-hole design guide
 that says holes should be .019" +\- .003" larger than the lead. >>

Steve,
   Been there, tried that.  I would definitely stay above .015".  I found my
wave solder defect rate started to increase as I let the holes go above .032"
larger than the lead.

Jon  Moore

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2