TECHNET Archives

June 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 21 Jun 2000 10:06:17 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Silent as in a desert. I'll make another try here: anyone who uses MIL-STD-883 Method 2032.1 for inspection of wafers and chips? My question was: what's the difference between this one and Method 2010, 2017?  Method 2032.1 have more pages, and more issues, but in many aspects they seem to be all the same. Hoped that some NASA, Grumman, Sandia or other guy had a clue. I also had a following question about MIL-STD-883 vs. ATL QCIM.  Many seem to abandon MIL-STD for other norms.

Sigh! I don't love MIL-STD either, but I have to deal with it sometimes. Double sigh!


> Ingemar Hernefjord
> Ericsson Microwave Systems

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2