TECHNET Archives

June 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Cara.Startek" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 16 Jun 2000 16:55:47 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Hello.

I'm looking for some clarification on TM 650 Number 2.6.3.3, Surface
Insulation Resistance, Fluxes.

I am testing no clean fluxes, thus using sample groups B, C, and F (ie
patten down/no clean, pattern up/no clean and control groups).

Looking at the document, I interpret it to mean that I require 6 coupons (3
for each of B and C) for each condition I'm testing, as well as 2 control
coupons.

This amounts to, say, 26 coupons (104 combs) to test 4 conditions.

Does this number sound right, or much too high?  Is the industry norm to
follow the standard to the letter, or to use a reduced number of samples?

Or do I simply need to test 6 combs, 3 per pattern up and down (per
condition)?

Thanks in advance for any advice:-)

Cara Startek

Process Engineering
http://www.leitch.com

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2