TECHNET Archives

June 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Blackburn <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 1 Jun 2000 12:01:11 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
The company I work for is in the process of moving from inspecting incoming
pcbs to a "dock to stock" program. Also, we are outsourcing more of our pcb
assemblies and the feeling is that the CM should be responsible for the
quality and reliability of the bare board.

Does anyone have feedback about dock to stock programs? What kind of SPC are
you doing? Is a thourough audit of the board vendor and CM enough? What kind
of scrap/defect rates are you seeing?

The reason I'm asking about this is because in a recent post about baking
boards, someone responded that they were doing copper plating thickness
measurement in the wall of the PTH. We experienced the same problem (blow
holes) and ended up doing the same test.

I would appreciate any feedback/experiences you might have.

Sincerely,

Mike Blackburn

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2