TECHNET Archives

May 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Clayton Gardner <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Clayton Gardner <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 May 2000 10:57:59 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Hi All

I was hoping I could draw on your experiences

We have a customer who is convinced that the BGA to be soldered to his board
should be processed without any paste deposit, just gel flux and rely on the
solder ball providing enough solder to form a reliable joint.

The process would be Paste print, Gel Flux dispense, part placement then
reflow.

We have successfully reworked BGAs using just Gel flux and a Sniper rework
station, but I have never processed a BGA through a reflow process using
just a gel flux.

Any comments on potential non-conformances, experiences using such a
process?

Any help would be appreciated

Clayton Gardner
Engineering Manager
AEMS
11-13 Fiveways Blvd
Keysborough VIC 3173
AUSTRALIA

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2