TECHNET Archives

April 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jon Moore <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 6 Apr 2000 13:00:23 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
In a message dated 4/5/00 11:35:36 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

>  Our wave solder machine has a baffle assembly made of Titanium. Every so
>  often some vanes or blades on the baffle break loose and have to be welded
>  back into place. Right now it's in pretty bad shape and I am going to get a
>  new one made. It would be much cheaper to have the new baffle made of
>  stainless steel rather than titanium. My question is : " Is there any
reason
>  why we couldn't use a wave baffle made of stainless steel to replace the
>  original titanium baffle.
>  Rod Lafond
>  Manager, Technical Training
>  Aimtronics Delta
I have done this, and eventually, over time, the solder begins to wet to the
stainless.
Jon Moore

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2