TECHNET Archives

March 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
TOE /Torben Østeraa <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:01:17 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Dear TechNetters, 

It seems that the 'oxide alternatives' all have a problem
processing rolled copper (RA), as e.g. used fore some flex
constructions. Due to the different structure, there is hardly
any coloring, and the surface structure must also be quite different.

Does this mean we are stuck with the oxides?. If not, what
alternatives are available.? That is, apart from doing
nothing. 

regards

Torben Østeraa
Printca AS

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2