TECHNET Archives

March 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brent Stayer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 22 Mar 2000 14:32:29 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (3137 bytes) , TEXT.htm (3964 bytes)
My experience with UV curable glue in HALT has not been favorable.  It will probably work fine in most applications, but crack when put through extreme temperature.  I'm not telling you to back off on the what works for you, however, we had to go away from it because we conducted HASS on 100% of our products and was not reliable after HASS.  We switched over to E6000 (brand name) which could take the extremes.  E6000 requires a longer cure time which caused more problems for manufacturing than UV curable, but we were more worried about reliability than making product faster in production.

>>> [log in to unmask] 03/20/00 05:05PM >>>
OK, I know, I know. Why is anyone still using thru hole parts which have to
be bonded to the board......!!

Well. all I can say is that we are and the question I have for this group
is what are the requirements for how much and how high.

Here's the background info:

An automotive electronics circuit card has about seven very tall
electrolytic caps on it which need to be secured to the board so that the
vibration does not sever the two leads on these parts.  Historically I have
always asked that these be bonded 360 degrees around the perimeter and a
minimum of 50%, up to a maximum of 100% of the height of the part using a
thixotropic UV cure adhesive.  This way the part could not bend or move at
all.

Using this criteria, I have never seen a failure as a result of the bonding.

Here's the problem:

A new engineer decides to minimize the adhesive amount (due to cycle time
of course) so that just it connects the board and the bottom of the part
only (maybe as high as .15" total which only allows about .10" of contact
to the body of the part.  These parts are .75" tall.  The new engineer
feels justified because the products which were bonded this way made it
thru a HALT test exposure without electrical failures.

I look at the assemblies which are supposedly OK and find that the adhesive
has broken loose from the pwb on at least five out of the seven parts and
what is remaining on the parts have fracture lines as well.

I consider this condition unacceptable and feel that after environmental
testing, adhesive bonding should remain intact 100%.

Am I right or should I yield since the assemblies made it thru the HALT
testing?  What bonding requirements do you impose for these type of parts

All comments are welcome.


-----------------------------------------------------
Click here for Free Video!!
http://www.gohip.com/freevideo/

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2