Mike's just about closest ; and considering that address is "filtered" by
ipc server ;
there is a reason for it we don't know, and Hugo does ;
otherwise the filter would not be in place (Monday piece of deductive
logic), hey ?
Lets see if Keach 's got an opinion about it.
Can we get it off Keach, or do we have to live with this tao cyber ghost ?
pk
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen R. Gregory [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Sunday, 19 March 2000 5:49
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Strange email...
In a message dated 03/18/2000 9:14:15 AM Central Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
<< Steve
Difficult to interpret, but somebody with the address
gzgcec <[log in to unmask]> made a number of postings to TechNet
last autumn [SNIP]
Alternatively, I see your e-mail address is c/o AOL. These guys are
notorious
for losing and delaying messages. Only yesterday, I was correponding with
another AOL member who complained that a message I sent him in January
arrived only yesterday [SNIP]
Brian >>
Hi Brian!
I'm not sure, but I don't think it's just a AOL thing, because Paul Klasek
had been getting them too and asked me about it last week...see his message
to me below. Are Paul and I the only ones getting this? Have any of you out
there got any of those messages? This is getting weird...
-Steve Gregory-
From: Paul Klasek
Sent: Wednesday, 15 March 2000 8:34
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: FW: Returned mail: Too many hops 115 (30 max): from
<@public.guangzhou.gd.cn:[log in to unmask]> via pop.guangzhou.gd.cn,
to <[log in to unmask]>
This is the thing which gives me creeps , note the addresses, 'm not opening
the attachments, help me to form some opinion about it .
This one came this morning, coming daily.
1
Are you getting them too ?
2
If not, should we contact Jack or Hugo ?
3
This billion nice note came this morning too .
thx paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, 15 March 2000 7:50
To: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
Subject: Returned mail: Too many hops 115 (30 max): from
<@public.guangzhou.gd.cn:[log in to unmask]> via pop.guangzhou.gd.cn,
to <[log in to unmask]>
The original message was received at Tue, 14 Mar 2000 14:50:05 -0600 (CST)
from pop.guangzhou.gd.cn [202.96.128.113]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<[log in to unmask]>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 Too many hops 115 (30 max): from
<@public.guangzhou.gd.cn:[log in to unmask]> via pop.guangzhou.gd.cn,
to<[log in to unmask]>
##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in
the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################
##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################
|
