TECHNET Archives

March 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Franklin Asbell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 14 Mar 2000 11:35:52 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (93 lines)
Steve,

Keep in mind how that is worded. The requirement say's "...20% of the
minimum value, or less."

Now if the artwork require a minimum trace width of let's say 10 mils, and
you make the trace 11 mils, the 11 mils trace is reduce by 21%, would this
be rejectable in accordance with A-600? Or would the minimum value (i.e. 10
mils plus or minus the allowable tolerance) be the starting point to
subtract 20%?

~finished stirring the pot, slowly walking out before things start flying~

Franklin D Asbell
Network Circuits, Inc.
Irving, Texas 75061
972-313-1400


----- Original Message -----
From: Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 7:52 AM
Subject: [TN] Etched "Notches" or "Nicks" in copper traces


> Hi ya'll!
>
> I gotta board here that has a problem with the traces, it looks something
> like this:
>
>
>                       Nick in the Trace
>                               |
>                              V         ___
> ________________    ___,/      \
>                             \_/               | <-------This is supposed
to
> be a via..
> ______________________,       |
>                                        \___/
>
> (I hope my "ascii cad" conveys what I'm trying to show) Reading the
> IPC-A-600F at 2.10.1.1 Conductor width it says for class 2 and 3 it is
> acceptable when;
>
> "Any combination of isolated edge roughness, nicks, pin holes, and
scratches
> exposing the base material that reduces the conductor width by 20% of the
> minimum value or less."
>
> So I'm reading this correctly, if the nick reduces the trace width by more
> than 20% of the overall trace width, it is a reject...right? This "nick"
> seems to have been etched like this...it's at the same place on the same
> board that's in a 4-up panel. The other 3-boards in the panel don't have
this
> "nick". Booger on the artwork or something huh?
>
> Just want to be sure...
>
> -Steve Gregory-
>
> ##############################################################
> TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
> ##############################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
following text in
> the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
> ##############################################################
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
additional
> information.
> If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.5315
> ##############################################################
>

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2