TECHNET Archives

March 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Sun, 12 Mar 2000 09:58:03 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (72 lines)
There are several criteria to consider and it also depends on the type of resin
involved. Taking an ordinary FR-4, this contains some molecules of sodium chloride
which, under humid conditions, can easily ionise and slowly migrate under low voltage
gradients, even as low as 10 V/mm. This can create rogue charges for high impedance
circuits. Then, the old MIL-P-275 suggested a conductor spacing for unprotected outer
layers at low altitudes conditions approximating 150 V/mm (and this was in the days of
G-10: FR-4 is slightly more susceptible). Personally, I think that anything over 100
V/mm for high impedance inner or outer layers (>1E9 ohms) is asking for trouble. For
low impedance or power circuits, you can possibly double this figure for inner layers.
On some SIR meter circuits I designed, I had all the hi-Z tracks on inner layers and I
kept a 5 mm spacing around them, for 100 V max. Similar considerations should apply to
inter-layer spacings, except that no-one wants the PCB to be a centimetre thick :-(
The risk is punch-through if the voltage gradient is too high under humid conditions or
curing is poor or there are minute inclusions. Personally, I think a gradient of 2
kV/mm, such as you quote, is most certainly not overkill and more likely to be
underkill if your circuitry is Hi-Z, to be used under humid conditions or cannot be
guaranteed to be perfectly manufactured. IMHO, FWIW

Brian

Goran Matijasevic wrote:

> Hello, Technetters!
>
> I was wondering about the rules for conductor spacing in PWB for
> electrical clearance if there is up to 500 V (low current) in the
> conductors.  IPC-2221 (table 6-1) states that innerlayer conductors
> should be 10 mils apart.  What is the reasoning behind this and is this
> "overkill"?  It states that this is for x-y and z-axis.  Does this vary
> with different material sets?  I assume someone did testing some time
> ago and came up with this table.  Anybody has experience with departing
> from these rules?  Do OEMs stick to them?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Goran
> ___________________________________________
>  Goran Matijasevic
>  Ormet Corporation
>  2236 Rutherford Road, Suite 109
>  Carlsbad, CA 92008
>  Tel: (760) 931-7099  Fax: (760) 431-6971
>  E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
>
> ##############################################################
> TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
> ##############################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
> ##############################################################
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
> information.
> If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.5315
> ##############################################################

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2