TECHNET Archives

March 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Subject:
From:
Grant Emandien <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Mar 2000 11:24:40 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, Grant Emandien <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Hi all,

The debate on cleaning of fluxes as well as the use no-clean fluxes seems to
hang around forever. We have been informed by our solder an flux supplier
that assemblies with no clean fluxes can be conformally coated without the
need to clean the boards.

The argument is that the high temperatures of the reflow oven 'burns off'
the active ingredients, leaving only inactive residues. These flux residues
do not have to be cleaned and can supposedly be coated. The rep. believes we
are taking a backward step by possibly opting to use water-based flux. Is
this pure sales talk?

Is anyone able to offer any advice or insight, or been able to assess the
environmental and electrical performance of such assemblies.

Regards
Grant

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2