TECHNET Archives

February 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"James H. Moffitt" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 23 Feb 2000 19:54:03 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Steve/Alcon:
- Multiple leads in a single PTH were always prohibited because: a) the Tce
differential of the (usually) dissimilar materials degraded the reliability
of the connection, b) adding a second lead (even a jumper) during
rework/repair engendered a high probability of incorporating flux and/or
leaving voids internal to the PTH and, c) rework became a procedure that
usually destroyed the integrity of the PTH wall/knee.
- USN (Naval Air Warfare Center Indianapolis [now deceased due to defense
cuts]) had significant data regarding failure of such connections in Naval
aircraft.  Such data is probably in a landfill somewhere in central Indiana
as little was saved (the data was indicted for telling DOD contractor "How
To" do the job correctly - such action has been deemed politically
incorrect).
- Hope the above helps some.  Regards, Jim Moffitt

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2