TECHNET Archives

February 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Hollandsworth, Ron" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 8 Feb 2000 15:59:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Graham:
Good question on a panacea formula for sigma calculation.  At 800 I came up
with 4.615707 sigma.  Yes, I did it the hard way.  That was breaking down
the inbetweens and arriving at a PPM and a sigma.  I don't even know if
that's legal.  arg!

I like Mike McMaster's comment.  It may be easier to do this using
measurements from a screw size, weight of something, or some objective
measurement.  The numbers all fit rather than using subjective data and PPM.

Now that I have confused everyone including myself.  I plan on going home,
eat dinner, and play my bass guitar for a while and ponder these things.

Good Night All
Ron

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2