TECHNET Archives

February 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:23:19 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Ryan
Sounds as if the toes of your QFPs are not plated but bare copper. Since
solder does not wet copper oxide it is clear that you cant see the solder
wicking over the toe and the bulging you mention is the effect of a
negative wetting angle. Again a sign that there was no wetting locally. I
wouldn't bother too much since on the heel you seem to have good wetting.
It has been shown in various tests ( please don't ask me for a reference
it's one of the things you read and think" OK again" and dump it ) that the
not wetted toes have no influence at all on the reliability of the solder
joint.

Best regards

Guenter

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2