How rrrefreshing ; can agree with just about every single line.
Since A. Einstein left his job as a patent clerk for a relatively more
qualified fields;
the relevant regulatories goes indeed to dogs (soo to speak) .
Just watch gov. jobs hiring presumptions Rudy ;
our nasa/dod/bio buds clans can take it undeservedly,
the saying goes "the best of us are unknown"
(no, it is not a late poetry Inge)
deceptions of reverse psychology in mass perceptions science is practiced
art,
= it is an immense advantage be perceived as dumb (workin' hard on it[know,
winnin' hey?,thx])
pk
-----Original Message-----
From: <Rudy Sedlak> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Saturday, 29 January 2000 8:38
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] patents
A little insight from someone who has been in the patent trenches, and
understands the wars:
First, remember that a patent is like a banner, telling the entire world the
central, most important parts of your invention, all must be revealed, and
nothing remains hidden.
NOTHING prevents someone from looking up your patent, and copying exactly
what you are doing. (Except of course that it is illegal, and for many
people, this is a detail)
It is your responsibility to PROVE that they are violating your patent, and
this can take years, and a lot of money. Patents have been called the "Full
Employment Contract for the legal community", and this is especially the
case
in the US.
All of the above starts to make the concept of a trade secret much more
appealing, UNLESS it is immediately obvious by looking at the finished
product that your patent is being violated. If your patent is simply a
better way to arrive at the same product, you are probably better off
keeping
it a trade secret.
Lastly, remember, the patent offices are staffed by people who cannot/do not
want to be in the highly competitive commercial world, and the law is so
arcane, and archaic, that it is years behind the rest of the world. My
company has abandoned patent applications simply because we could not get
the
patent office to understand the concept of what we are patenting.
Very obvious things have been patented. We have been sued over things that
we thought were so obvious that they could not be patented. In some cases
two patents have been issued for essentially the same idea. The patent
office is not full of the brightest lights in the world, and NOBODY ever got
fired from the government for being dumb.
Rudy Sedlak
RD Chemical Company
##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in
the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################
##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################
|
