TECHNET Archives

January 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Charles E. McMahon" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 17 Jan 2000 08:41:12 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (81 lines)
Pat:

Relative to reducing the incidence of contamination on LPI masks whether
they are matte, semi glass or glossy, it has been my experience that if the
fabricator performed a double UV bump, it tended to provide a harder finish
with less porosity and therefor a cleaner surface.

Have you found this to be true.

Charlie
----- Original Message -----
From: Pat Kane <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2000 7:59 AM
Subject: [TN] (no subject)


> Mike
>
> Your assumptions regarding the source of your increased contamination
levels
> are correct.  The porosity, thickness, and cure of the mask has a direct
> relationship to its ability to be cleaned thoroughly.  The cleaning system
> configuration also has a role to play as to whether you are have a
> saponifier, heated DI water, and settings of the nozzle pressures.  You
are
> also correct in that matte type masks help to reduce solder balls.
>
> In any process or material change exercise it is a good idea to baseline
your
> current performance, then use this data to evaluate the effectiveness of
the
> changes implemented.  I would suggest that you test the ionic cleanliness
> levels of your existing mask finish relative to the levels of
contamination
> and effectiveness of your cleaning system.  Then repeat the experiment for
> the mask candidates you are evaluating.  There are several very good matte
> type masks on the market, so you should be able to find something to meet
> your needs.  The investigation into which mask to select requires a Design
Of
> Experiments to downselect to the best performer for your application.
>
> Contact me offline if you require further assistance.
>
> Regards,
>
> Pat Kane
> Contamination Studies Laboratories
> 765-457-8095
>
> ##############################################################
> TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
> ##############################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
following text in
> the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
> ##############################################################
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
additional
> information.
> If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.5365
> ##############################################################
>

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2