Hi James,

What's meaning of "adjacent companies"? Was it mistype of adjacent 
components? For the paper you mentioned below, could you please paste it in 
this forum or send me the link?

Thanks in advance.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Liu" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 1:06 PM
Subject: [TGAsia] 答复: Tacky flux for BGA rework


> Hi LP,
> I had ever translated a paper on rework of mirror BGA design. In this 
> paper, some tests had shown that tacky flux was not good for mirror BGA 
> and adjacent companies. You can find this paper from our newsletters this 
> year.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> James Liu 刘春光
> Director, Technology & Standardization 技术与标准总监
> IPC China
> 上海市长宁区延安西路1088号2303室
> Suite 2303，#1088 West Yan'an Rd., Changning, Shanghai 200052 PRC
> Tel:   +86 21 5497 3435
> Fax:  +86 21 5497 3437
> MP:   +86 136 0133 3491
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> www.ipc.org.cn<http://www.ipc.org.cn>
> ________________________________
> 发件人: TGAsia [[log in to unmask]] 代表 LP Koay [[log in to unmask]]
> 发送时间: 2009年8月7日 10:08
> 收件人: Listserv TGAsia
> 主题: [TGAsia] Tacky flux for BGA rework
>
> Hi All,
>
> What is the benefit of using tacky flux for BGA rework compare to solder 
> paste? Do you have any technical paper to share?
>
> Thanks,
> LP
>