Blair,
I wish that what you stated was true for aerospace. I have a customer that
insists on Mil-Std-2000C and other old specs. Despite my best efforts to
indicate that we should not build product to a cancelled specification, the
customer refuses to change the contract language.
Apparently, you know of some clause where it is my option to make this call.
So, have you had success with a customer who says build it to "X" where you
come back and say, "No, we're going to build it to 'Y'"?
Just curious,
Bill Kasprzak
Moog Inc.
Electronic Process Engineering
-----Original Message-----
From: Blair K. Hogg [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:49 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Mil-P-55110 versus MIL-PRF-31032
Daan,
If I remember correctly from my days in Aerospace it is perfectly acceptable
for a company to migrate to a new standard when an old standard is
superseded. It is entirely the option of the organization to determine which
version of the standard to use - the one called for in the contract or the
latest version or superseded standard.
However, if you are going to do this, I would recommend that you let your
customers know this when they place an order with the old standard called
out.
Blair Hogg
QA Manager
GAI-Tronics Corp.
>>> [log in to unmask] 08/25/03 10:21AM >>>
Hi Technet,
Mil-P-55110D is not active anymore, and has been replaced by MIL-PRF-31032.
If the production-drawing states "PCB shall be produced according to to
MIL-P-55110D" does it mean that the board manufacturer has the freedom to
use the replacement specification ? The specific issue is that Mil-P-55110 D
does not allow exposed fibers, whereas Mil-PRF-31032 does allow this (with
some restrictions of course), but I assume there are more diffferences
between these two specs.
Best regards,
Daan Terstegge
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the
presence of computer viruses.
www.hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated
**********************************************************************
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the
BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet
NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send
e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of
previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web
site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------
|
