TECHNET Archives

June 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Greg Bartlett" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
25 Jun 1997 09:42:23 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (98 lines)
                      RE>Tented Vias                               6/25/97

Hi Frank,

I'm not sure that there are many problems with tented vias entrapping
contaminants, but I'd believe that *plugged* vias after HASL can cause
trouble.  My guess is that the underlying reason for this is that it can be
expensive and time-consuming to perform the failure analysis on single vias
which might have failed.  It requires microsectioning and metallographic
inspection equipment, as well as skilled analysts, that most companies don't
have.  

In a past life, I was with a large OEM that had these capabilities, and we
actually discovered some vias which had corroded through because of the
presence of entrapped water soluble fluxes.  I seem to remember that it only
took a month or so to eat through the 1 mil of copper plating.  

At Mercury, we haven't plugged vias for quite some time now because of the
entrapped contaminant issue, but also because we had a problem with the
solder stencil sitting too far from the board.  This gave us lousy printing
of our BGA patterns.  We don't do any ICT, and we partially cover our via
pads with soldermask.  This, in conjunction with a bare copper/OSP surface
finish, tends to prevent bridging through the solder wave.  

Greg Bartlett
Mercury Computer Systems
Chelmsford, MA
[log in to unmask]
--------------------------------------
Date: 6/24/97 9:05 PM
To: Greg Bartlett
From: Frank Hinojos
     A couple of weeks ago I asked all of you about the dangers of using 
     tented LPI vias.  I received an overwhelming response that while it is 
     good for assembly, it may be very detrimental to the boards' 
     reliability due to chemical interaction of contaminants and uncured 
     LPI in the via.  Why then does it seem that everyone is using tented 
     vias and why haven't we heard of problems arising due to your 
     concerns?
     
     Frank Hinojos
     Watkins-Johnson Co.  

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************


------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------
Received: by mailgate with SMTP;24 Jun 1997 21:02:22 -0400
Received: from charon.mc.com by mc.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id VAA20560; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 21:02:15 -0400
Received: from simon.ipc.org (simon.ipc.org [209.42.29.3])
          by charon.mc.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id VAA15761; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 21:02:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ipc.org by simon.ipc.org via SMTP
(940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
	 id TAA03246; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 19:36:08 -0700
Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 19:36:08 -0700
Received: by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
	id m0wgdLD-000BlJC; Tue, 24 Jun 97 16:41 CDT
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Old-Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 14:53:34 -0700
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
From: [log in to unmask] (Frank Hinojos)
Subject: Tented Vias
To: [log in to unmask]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
Resent-Message-ID: <"EWWpA.0.bvP.Dy3ip"@ipc>
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/13617
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]



***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************


ATOM RSS1 RSS2