TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Thu, 1 Aug 1996 18:24:56 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
     The debate of wet lamination has been going on for years and won't be
finalized for many more to come.  The pro's and con's vary depending on who
you talk to and how successful they have been with wet lam.  Basically, wet
lam is supposed to increase your adhesion and conformation of dry film, but
if your lamination and preclean processes are in control, you can obtain
excellent dry film adhesion and conformation without the additional process
of wet lam.
     In addition, not all dry films have the compatibility with wet lam,
therefore the number of films available for wet lam are much less than those
for conventional lamination.
     Morton does not push the wet lam process because it is seldom needed.
 We have always been able to solve adhesion and conformation problems with
the correct combination of preclean, lamination, and dry film
characteristics.
     If you have a wet lam process, conventional recommended lamination exit
temperatures do not apply.  You should be process at a much lower temperature
than normal.
Ken Bridges

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2