TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Jack Crawford)
Date:
Thu, 6 Jun 1996 13:57:46 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
>From the EMPF HelpLine in Indianpolis, prepared by Pat Kane.

> SMT magazine for a back issue that has a chart showing
>comparisons of equipment between vendors.  Don't know which issue but about
>one year ago.
>Secondly, the more important thing is to define his needs i.e. thru-put,
>type of components, captive or contract builds, etc.  The thing to remember
>here is that these machines ALL place components and do it well or they
>would not be in the business.  The evaluation becomes what are YOU going to
>do with it in your facility?  If you are changing the mix of parts out a
>lot, then you should investigate machines that are easiest to changeover.
>If you are building the same thing eveyday, then thru-put may be the most
>important parameter.  The ease of programming becomes a major difference
>between machines especially if you are a contract builder and change over
>a lot.

>He can call me if he likes and we can discuss this further when I know more
>about what his application will be.

                      Jack Crawford
                  HelpLine Manager
    Electronics Mfg. Productivity Facility
                     317.226.5616
               Visit our homepage at:
                http://www.empf.org




ATOM RSS1 RSS2