TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
re: IPC spec IPC-A-600D
From:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 21 Feb 96 11:44:11 PST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines) 
The current revision is IPC-A-600E 1995.
Circumferential voids are not allowed for
classes 1, 2 or 3 per 4.1.4 of that specification.

Darren Hitchcock
Merix Corporation
[log in to unmask]


Steve Quinn <[log in to unmask]> Wrote:
| 
| 
|         We are wondering what is the latest rev of 
| this spec(IPC-A-600D).
| We have one dated 9-25-89.  Specifically we are 
| questioning allowable
| plating voids in through holes.  Are circumferential 
| voids acceptable in
| current spec?  
| 
|         Thanks for the help.
| 
|                 Steve Quinn
|                 Heurikon Corp
| 
|

ATOM RSS1 RSS2